Perspectives on Free-Speech Zones on College Campuses Essay

Naturally, many negative connotations come along with the endpoint free- saving district. The wording alone automatically insinuates that free speech should not be allowed everywhere, which is hardly the true intention of the topic. Sometimes the decently of free speech is interpreted advantage of such as in certain rallies and protests, where roiling noise, violence, and destruction often occurs. Universities hold a responsibility to their students of providing a more or less safe and undisruptive environment to learn and excel in.Universities be not creating free-speech zones to coiffure free speech, but rather to maintain a secure cash machine that is conducive to concentration and higher learning. Universities should be qualified to maintain a certain level of safety on campus in whatever means they choose. The University reserves the right to relocate or cancel the activity due to disruption from excessive noise levels, traffic entanglement, or if the safety of indi viduals is in question (West Virginia Universitys Student Handbook 91).They are not undermining the right of free speech that we as Americans legally hold, but are creating an leave means for demonstrators to voice their opinions without causing unnecessary disruption and chaos in inappropriate places on campus. An issue I do have with this idea of a free-speech zone is that there isnt a clear comment of when or where these zones should be manipulation of goods and servicesd. Who is to say whether or not the voicing of a certain opinion or idea requires the use of a free-speech zone? If what bring ins the use of a free-speech zone was better defined whence the use of such zones could be more affective and appropriate.As stated by Robert J. Scott, protest zones have been used at many political conventions and different major events. Protest zones can be reasonable restrictions that allow free-speech rights to be expressed while decreasing safety concerns and preventing undue d isruption (Scott 92). With the story of violence and destruction that is associated with protests, it is only natural that certain precautions be taken to prevent such problems. It is too vague to say the free thoughtfulness of views or opinions may not disrupt the normal break away of the university, as stated in the West Virginia Universitys student handbook.Who decides what the normal function truly is, or when it is being disrupted? If a university decides to establish the use of free-speech zones then(prenominal) they should be able to provide a clear and compendious description of when, and for what purpose, these zones should be used. One of a universities top priorities is to make their campus as safe and secure as possible, and if free-speech zones or protest zones are what they go through are necessary to maintain that security then they should be able to enforce them.The problem really comes down to whether or not these zones are used appropriately. If used extensi vely, and at levels that are unnecessary for the safety of students, then human rights issues could easily come into play. But if used in a smart way, such as for larger demonstrations of freedom of speech, like protests and rallies, then they could be helpful in preventing destruction and/or distraction on university campuses. Requiring those expressing dissent to obey the law while doing so does not constitute repression (Scott 92).