Do any foreign policy models (the bureaucratic politics model, Essay

Do any conflicting policy models (the bureaucratic politics model, groupthinking, etc.) help to explain American failure in Vietnam - Essay moralAccording to the research findings before oil was discovered in Middle East, this region had become a major target for a myriad of religious conflicts and wars, which were fought over the rich resources found there and the touchstone of land. When the Ottoman Empire faced a downfall, it provided a path for the European colonial and imperial powers to hold back matters in their own vested interests and gain entre to various parts of Asia, which gradu protagonist in any case enabled them to secure these regions in their own favor. The biggest asset of Middle East is the amount of oil that is concentrated in the region, which has simultaneously to a fault emerged as one of the biggest problems. Therefore the Western population is highly accustomed to the propaganda of the Middle Eastern regions, and this has also brought Islam in the mid dle. It was especially prominent during the European colonial times, which was also exacerbated by Edward Said in his famous book, Orientalism. The way it has been negatively stereotyped has provided tremendous justification for involvement and also in ensuring a legitimate level of stability for the interests of powers that are present in the region. Another issue, which is also pivotal to Middle East, is racialism and cultural stereotyping that has become very(prenominal) concentrated. There are certain war films that depict an Islamic or Arab group as bad, which clearly show the current conflicts etc. A bad guy is very often an Arab from one of the rogue states and because of the 9/11 attacks perpetrated against the join States and also the War on terror its very likely that this description will continue. Another huge problem is that to maintain their self-confidence and supremacy in the Middle Eastern, the West has also put a lot of power, money and bend in the hands of corrupt Arab leaders, and consequently collaborated in the overthrow of those people who were follown as a panic to their interests. Furthermore, it has contributed a great deal in keeping the populations at bay, for the wealth, power and militarization of the elite class. It is also said to be done for combating the phenomena of communism. The major underlying factor has however been the effort to secure access to imperative resources such as oil (Bard, 1). Middle East is one of the most militarized regions in the world, and there are a lot of arms present. Majority of the people who have been oppressed see the influence of the United States in their region as the biggest cause of all the problems, which has also led to a rise in several acts of terrorism, Islamic militancy and anti-west sentiments. Although, there have been several declarations by the United States department that most of the American interests are vested in supporting the foundation of governments based on a de mocratic edifice, there have been some instances when the U.S has supported the suppressed authoritiess in the Middle East. When the U.S were having a ratty War with the Soviet Union, there were a few policymakers who saw a very stable ally in the Middle East, whether it was tyrannical or not, which would be more preferred rather than an unstable regime that would side with the Soviets. Even when the Soviet Union collapsed, there was a whole lot of financial financial aid and U.S dollars that kept flowing in to the regions, which were supposedly known as the centers for the regulation of human rights, or the evident lack of democracy. This also included Saudi Arabia (where a Wahhabi administration puts restrictions on the rights of women), Israel (which doesnt promote the thought of equal rights for all its citizens), and the Egyptian government where an Egyptian cum American was imprisoned for supporting elector participation. In