Monday, August 5, 2019
Social Work In Criminal Justice
Social Work In Criminal Justice This module will address the role of social work in the criminal justice context. This context includes a range of agencies working with adults and young persons who are involved in offending and agencies who work with the victims of crime. Social Work within the criminal justice context can therefore involve direct work with people who have offended, for example working as a Probation Officer or working in a voluntary sector organisation that provide services to people involved in the criminal justice system. It also involves working with children and families who may be involved in the criminal justice system or affected by crime. The module will cover the context and settings of social work in the criminal justice system, the principles, methods and interventions of working with offending behaviour; assessment in criminal justice contexts; the impact of crime and working with children and young people in the criminal justice system. A commitment to anti-oppressive practice underpins the module and students will be encouraged to critically think and evaluate their own practice and perspectives. The module runs in Semester One and consists of lectures which take place on Tuesdays from 22/09/09 to 27/10/09. Lectures will be held from 10am to 1pm every Tuesday and on alternate weeks there will also be lectures from 2pm to 4pm in the afternoon. Tutorials will take place on alternate Fridays, beginning on 25/09/09. Students will be divided into tutorial groups and tutorials will run from 12-1pm and 1pm to 2pm on alternate Fridays. Students will be notified of their assigned tutor group in due course. Students will be assessed for via a written assignment which is due for submission on: Monday 2nd November at 4pm. Module Aims Students will understand the social work role within a criminal Justice context, and develop their understanding of the knowledge, skill and value base pertinent to the area of practice. Learning Outcomes Students will understand policy and legislation that informs the social work role in this context. Students will learn the theoretical perspectives informing social work intervention in a criminal justice context. Students will explore the research and methods that inform social work intervention in the criminal justice context. Students will develop skills in the critical examination of theory and its application to practice. Students will understand their own value base in relation to this area and have considered ethical issues in relation to practice. Week 1 Introduction to Social Work and Criminal Justice history, context and settings Date: 22/09/09 Lecture: 10 1pm Nicola Carr Tutorial 25/09/09 (Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) Nicola Carr and Alan Harpur Week 2 Working with offending behaviour- Principles, Methods and Interventions Date: 29/09/09 Lecture: 10am -1pm Nicola Carr Lecture: 2pm -4pm Nicola Carr Week 3 Assessment in criminal justice contexts Date: 06/10/09 Lecture: 10am 1pm Nicola Carr Tutorial: 09/09/09 (Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) Nicola Carr and Alan Harpur Week 4 The impact of offending working with victims of crime and Restorative Justice approaches Date: 13/10/09 Lecture: 10am to 1pm Nicola Carr Lecture: 2pm to 4pm (Victim Panel Susan Reid, Victim Support, Northern Ireland and Christine Hunter, PBNI Victims Unit) Week 5 Public Protection, Prisons and Resettlement Date: 20/10/09 Lecture: 10am to 1pm (PPNAI, Willie McAuley; John Warren, Extern) Tutorial: 23/09/09 (Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) Week 6: Working with young people in the criminal justice system balancing welfare and justice? Date: 27/10/09 Lecture: 10am to 1pm Nicola Carr Lecture: 2pm to 4pm (Kelvin Doherty, Youth Justice Agency) Course Reading Recommended Texts A further extensive list of recommended reading is provided for each week of the course based on subject area. Assessment Assessment of this module is through a written assignment which is due for submission: Monday 2nd November by 4pm. You are required to submit one printed copy to Reception in 6 College Park and one electronic copy via My Modules on Queens Online before 4.00pm on Tues 5th Jan. Please refer to the following link on the Schools web site for submission procedures http://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofSociologySocialPolicySocialWork/ImportantNotice/#d.en.93464 Students must answer one of the essay questions below and the word count for this assignment is: 2500 Words +/- 10% Essay Questions Restorative Justice aims to address the consequences of offending for victims and offenders and communities in a meaningful way. Critically evaluate this statement with reference to practice in the Northern Ireland criminal justice system. Young people who are involved in offending should be treated as ââ¬Ëchildren first. Discuss this statement with reference to policy and practice in working with young people in the criminal justice system. The history of probation is one of an increased emphasis on public protection. Discuss this statement with reference to probation practice in Northern Ireland. Assessment of the risk of re-offending and risk of harm should guide the nature of intervention with offenders. Critically evaluate this statement with reference to theory, policy and practice. GUIDELINES This assignment should be based on learning from your lectures, workshops and guided study / reading .You are encouraged to start researching and preparing at an early stage as the submission date is A discussion forum will also be established on queens on-line in order to assist you to share ideas with tutors and other students and to seek to share resources for the assignment. REFERENCING Your assignment must be supported with references from relevant readings and you must follow the referencing guidelines relating to books, journals and web based material provided in your course handbook. You are encouraged to read widely in preparing for your assignment, drawing on material from your reading list as well as other relevant material. You should also look at the general assessment guidelines in your assessment handbook for more general assignment writing skills. Essay guidance The best way to structure the answer to a question is to begin with a very brief analysis of what you interpret the question as being about, and then a road-map of how you propose to answer it. This focuses your mind on organising a clear, coherent structure for your answer. Be very careful to indicate as much as possible of what empirical or other evidence there is to support your points. It is not necessary to come to a definite conclusion on the question: uncertainty having weighed the arguments and evidence is almost always an acceptable position. What is essential, however, is that you have given sufficient weight to arguments contrary to your own, with reasons to back up your rejection. Frequently questions require you to present and assess a number of viewpoints, indicated by such instructions as discuss, assess, how far is the case thatâ⬠¦ etc. But it is always essential to consider what alternative interpretations to your own argument there might be. Source: Oxford University Press (Online Resource Centre) Requirements for the Award of 10 Credit Points In order to be awarded 10 credit points towards the completion of the Bachelors Degree in Social Work students must: Complete and submit a written assignment and gain a mark of at least 40%. Attend at least 80% of all lectures; and Attend at least 80% of all workshops. Students who fail to attend for the required number of lectures and tutorials, or who miss particularly crucial elements of the module, may be required to undertake additional work in order to be awarded credit points. LATE SUBMISSION OF COURSEWORK The Universitys rule is that for work submitted after the deadline, 5 percentage points per working day are deducted from the received mark up to a maximum of five days. Thereafter, the work receives zero. Extensions to essay deadlines are covered by a formal University procedure and may be granted on grounds of ill health or personal circumstances. You need to submit a completed Exemption from Late Coursework Marks Penalty Form (available from the Office, 6 College Park and on the Schools Website www.qub.ac.uk/soc ) within three days of the essay deadline. The form should be accompanied by a medical certificate (NOT self-certification) and/or other written supporting evidence and should be taken to the module convenor, preferably during his/her office hours, who decides whether or not to agree to an extension. Lecture Outlines Week 1 Introduction to Social Work and Criminal Justice history, context and settings Date: 22/09/09 Lecture: 10 1pm This lecture will provide an introduction to the module by outlining the role of social work in the criminal justice context. The first lecture will cover the history of social work within the criminal justice context and will explore theoretical perspectives on the intersection of social work and the criminal justice system. Particular consideration will be given to the role of the social worker within the parameters of the ââ¬Ëcare or ââ¬Ëcontrol debate. Some of the key phases of social work intervention in the criminal justice system will be explored ranging from original social work role as a ââ¬Ëcourt missionary through to the current drive towards interventions based on the assessment of risk and ââ¬Ëevidence based practice. Tutorial 25/09/09 (Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) Following from the introductory lecture, this tutorial will focus on some of the key paradigm shifts that have influenced the role of social work within the criminal justice context. Students will be encouraged to critically explore the role of social work within this setting. Key Reading Social Work in the Criminal Justice System History, Context and Settings Audit Commission (1989) Promoting Value for Money in the Probation Service, London: HMSO Brownlee, I. (1998) Community Punishment. A Critical Introduction. Essex: Longman Criminology Series Burnett, R. Roberts, C. (Ed.) (2004) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice Cullompton: Willan Chapman, T. and Hough, M. (1998) Evidence Based Practice, London: HMIP Farrant, F. (2006) ââ¬ËKnowledge production and the punishment ethic: The demise of the probation service. Probation Journal, 53,4: 317-333 Fulton, B. Parkhill, T. (2009) Making the Difference: an oral history of probation in Northern Ireland. Belfast: PBNI. Available at: http://www.pbni.org.uk/archive/Publications/Other%20Publications/pbni%2025th%20book.pdf Gorman, K. (2001) ââ¬ËCognitive behaviourism and the search for the Holy Grail: The quest for a universal means of managing offender risk. Probation Journal, 48, 3: 3-9 Kemshall, H. (2002) ââ¬ËEffective practice in probation: An example of ââ¬ËAdvanced Liberal responsibilisation? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41,1: 41-58 Lindsay, T. Quinn, K. (2001) ââ¬ËFair Play in Northern Ireland: Towards Anti-Sectarian Practice. Probation Journal, 42, 2: 102-109 McKnight, J. (2009) ââ¬ËSpeaking up for Probation Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48,4: 327-343 Mair, G. (Ed.) (2004) What Matters in Probation Cullompton: Willan Merrington, S. and Stanley, S. (2000) ââ¬ËReflections: doubts about the what works initiative, Probation Journal, 47, 4: 272-275 Robinson, G. Raynor, P. (2006) ââ¬ËThe future of rehabilitation: What role for the probation service? Probation Journal, 53,4: 334-346 Vanstone, M. (2004) ââ¬ËMission control: The origins of a humanitarian service. Probation Journal, 51, 1: 34-47 Week 2 Working with offending behaviour- Principles, Methods and Interventions Date: 29/09/09 Lecture: 10am -1pm Nicola Carr Lecture: 2pm -4pm Nicola Carr These lectures will focus on the development and use of community penalties. Students will learn about the development of the ââ¬Ëwhat works initiative and the drive towards effective, evidence-based practice. Key issues such as risk management and public protection will be explored and students will be encouraged to critically evaluate these developments. Key developments in working with offenders will be outlined including some of the most recent methods of intervention based on research evidence. Key Reading Working with offending behaviour- Principles, Methods and Interventions Andrews, D., Bonta, J. and Hoge, R. (1990a) ââ¬ËClassification for effective rehabilitation, Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 17 ,1: 19-52. Andrews, D. et al. (1990b) ââ¬ËDoes correctional treatment work? Criminology, 28, 369-404 Ansbro, M. (2008) ââ¬ËUsing attachment theory with offenders. Probation Journal, 55,3: 231-244 Bailie, R. (2006) ââ¬ËWomen Offenders: The Development of a Policy and Strategy for Implementation by the Probation Board for Northern Ireland Irish Probation Journal, 3, 1:97-110 Batchelor, S. (2004) ââ¬ËProve me the bam! Victimization and agency in the lives of young women who commit violent offences. Probation Journal, 52, 4: 358-375 Bhui, H.S. Buchanan, J. (2004) ââ¬ËWhat Works? and complex individuality. Probation Journal, 51,3: 195-196 Bottoms, A. and Williams, W. (1979) ââ¬ËA non-treatment paradigm for probation practice British Journal of Social Work, 9,2: 160-201 Burnett R Roberts C (2004) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Developing Evidence Based Practice. Cullompton: Willan Burnett, R. McNeill, F. (2005) ââ¬ËThe place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal, 52,3: 221-242 Bushway, S.D.; Thornberry, T.P. Krohn, M.D. (2003) ââ¬ËDesistance as a developmental process: A comparison of static and dynamic approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 2: 129-153 Cherry, S. (2005) Transforming Behaviour: Pro-social Modelling in Practice. Cullompton: Willan Dixon, L. Ray, L. (2007) ââ¬ËCurrent issues and developments in race hate crime Probation Journal, 54,2: 109-124 Farrall, S. Bowling, B. (1999) ââ¬ËStructuration, human development and desistance from crime. British Journal of Criminology 17, 2: 255-267 Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan Healy, D. ODonnell, I. (2008) ââ¬ËCalling time on crime: Motivation, generativity and agency in Irish Probationers. Probation Journal, 55,1: 25-38 Jordan, R. OHare, G. (2007) ââ¬Ë The Probation Board for Northern Irelands Cognitive Self-Change Programme: An overview of the pilot programme in the community. Irish Probation Journal, 4,1: 125-136 Loughran, H. (2006) ââ¬ËA place for Motivational Interviewing in Probation? Irish Probation Journal, 3,1: 17-29 Martinson, R. (1974) ââ¬ËWhat works? Questions and answers about prison reform, ThePublic Interest, 10, 22-54 McCulloch, P. (2005) ââ¬ËProbation, social context and desistance: retracing the relationship. Probation Journal, 52,1: 8-22 McGuire, J. Priestly, P. (1995) ââ¬ËReviewing ââ¬Å"what worksâ⬠: Past, present and future. In J. McGuire (Ed.) What Works in Reducing Re-offending. Sussex: Wiley McNeill, F. (2001) ââ¬ËDeveloping effectiveness: Frontline Perspectives, Social Work Education, 20,6: 671-678 McNeill, F. (2006) ââ¬ËA desistance paradigm for offender management Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 1: 39-62 McWilliams, W. (1987) ââ¬ËProbation, pragmatism and policy, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26,2:97-121 Maruna, S. (2001) Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives. Washington D.C. : American Psychological Association Maruna, S.; Immarigeon, R. LeBel, T.P. (2004) ââ¬ËEx-offender Reintegration: Theory and Practice In: S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds.) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Integration, Cullompton: Willan Miller, W. Rollnick, S. (2006) Motivational Interviewing, Gilford Press, New York Raynor, P. Vanstone, M. (1994) ââ¬ËProbation practice, effectiveness and the non-treatment paradigm, British Journal of Social Work, 24,4: 387-404 Rex, S. (1999) ââ¬ËDesistance from offending: Experiences of probation, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 4: 366-383 Rex, S. Bottoms, A. (2003) ââ¬ËEvaluating the evaluators: Researching the accreditation of offender programmes. Probation Journal, 50,4: 359-368 Smith, D. (2004) ââ¬ËThe uses and abuses of positivism, in G. Mair (Ed.) What Matters in Probation, Cullompton: Willan Vanstone, M. (2000) ââ¬ËCognitive-behavioural work with offenders in the UK: a history of an influential endeavour, Howard Journal, 39,2: 171-183 Week 3 Assessment in criminal justice contexts Date: 06/10/09 Lecture: 10am 1pm Nicola Carr Assessing the risk of re-offending and the risk of harm is one of the core tasks of the social worker within the criminal justice system .This lecture will cover the background of assessment and some of the factors that impact on assessment. Particular attention will be paid to research evidence concerning, dynamic and static risk factors in relation to offending. In addition, attention will be paid to protective factors and research relating to desistance from crime. An overview will be provided of a range of risk assessment tools currently in use within the criminal justice system. Tutorial: 09/09/09(Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) Nicola Carr and Alan Harpur This tutorial will be in a workshop format and will focus on the use of risk assessment tools in relation to the assessment of the risk re-offending and risk of harm with the aim of planning interventions to address these areas. Assessment in criminal justice contexts Aye-Maung, N. Hammond, N. (2000) ââ¬ËRisk of re-offending and Needs Assessments: The Users Perspective. (Home Office Research Study 216). London: Home Office Best, P. (2007) ââ¬Ë The Assessment, Case Management and Evaluation System (ACE) in Northern Ireland. Irish Probation Journal, 4,1: 101-107 Kemshall, H. (1998) Risk in Probation Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate Kemshall, H. (2003) Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Berkshire: Open University Press Kemshall, H. (2008) Understanding the Management of High Risk Offenders. Berkshire: Open University Press Merrington, S. Skinns, J. (2002) ââ¬ËUsing ACE to Profile Criminogenic Needs, Probation Studies Unit ACE Practitioner Bulletin No. 1, University of Oxford. Available at: http://www.crim.ox.ac.uk/publications/psubull1.pdf ODwyer, G. (2008) ââ¬ËA Risk Assessment and Risk Management Approach to Sexual Offending for the Probation Service. Irish Probation Journal, Vol. 5: 84-91 Robinson, G. (2002) ââ¬ËExploring risk management in probation practice: contemporary developments in England and Wales. Punishment and Society, 4, 1: 5-25 Robinson, G. (2003) ââ¬ËImplementing OASys: lessons from research into LSI-R and ACE Probation Journal, 50, 1:30-40 Week 4 The impact of offending working with victims of crime and Restorative Justice approaches Date: 13/10/09 Lecture: 10am to 1pm Nicola Carr This lecture will address issues concerning the impact of crime, and will explore issues relating to victims of crime. The concept of the ââ¬Ëvictim of crime will be critically assessed with reference to a range of literature, and the victims role within the criminal justice system will be explored. The role of the Social Worker in working with victims of crime will also be analysed. The principles and practices of restorative justice approaches will be examined and explored specifically in relation to the Northern Ireland context. Lecture: 2pm to 4pm (Victim Panel Susan Reid, Victim Support, Northern Ireland and Christine Hunter, PBNI Victims Unit) The afternoon lecture will involve a panel presentation from representatives from two agencies working with victims of crime. The presenters will focus on particular issues and themes relating to their work and students will have an opportunity to discuss the issues raised. Victims and the Impact of Crime Hoyle, C. Zedner, L. (2007) ââ¬ËVictims, victimization and the criminal justice system. In M. Maguire; R. Morgan R. Reiner (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (Fourth Edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press Hunter, C. (2005) ââ¬ËThe View of Victims of Crime on How the Probation Board for Northern Ireland Victim Information Scheme Might Operate Irish Probation Journal, 2,1: 43-47 Norton, S. (2007) ââ¬ËThe place of victims in the Criminal Justice System. Irish Probation Journal, 4,1: 63-76 Williams, B. (2009) ââ¬ËVictims In: C. Hale; K, Hayward; A. Wahidin E. Wincup (Eds.) Criminology (Second Edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press Restorative Justice Braithwaite, J. (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Campbell C, Devlin R, OMahony D, Doak J (2005) Evaluation of the Northern Ireland Youth conferencing Service NIO Research and Statistical Series: Report No 12 Daly, K. (2002) ââ¬ËRestorative Justice: The real story Punishment and Society, 4,1: 55-79 Daly, K. Stubbs, J. (2006) ââ¬ËFeminist engagement with restorative justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10, 1: 9-28 Gelsthorpe, L. Morris, A. (2002) ââ¬ËRestorative youth justice. The last vestiges of welfare? In: J. Muncie; G. Hughes E. McLaughlin (Eds.) Youth Justice Critical Readings. London: Sage Gray, P. (2005) ââ¬ËThe politics of risk and young offenders experiences of social exclusion and restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 45,6: 938-957 Hamill, H. (2002) ââ¬ËVictims of paramilitary Punishment Attacks in Belfast. In C. Hoyle R. Young (Eds.) New Visions of Crime Victims, 49-70., Oxford: Hart Hoyle, C. (2002) ââ¬ËSecuring restorative justice for the ââ¬Å"Non-Participatingâ⬠Victim. In: In C. Hoyle R. Young (Eds.) New Visions of Crime Victims, 97-132., Oxford: Hart McEvoy, K. Mika, H. (2002) ââ¬Ë Restorative Justice and the critique of informalism in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 3: 534-562 McLaughlin, E.; Fergusson, R.; Hughes, G. Westmarland, L. Restorative Justice: Critical Issues London, Sage Marshall, T. (1999) Restorative Justice: An Overview. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/occ-resjus.pdf Morris, A. (2002) ââ¬ËCritiquing the critics: A brief response to critics of restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42,3: 596-615 OMahony, D. Doak, J. ââ¬ËRestorative Justice- Is More Better? The Experience of Police-led Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 43, no. 5 Shapland, J.; Atkinson, A.; Atkinson, H.; Dignan, J.; Edwards, L; Hibbert, J. Howes, M.; Johnstone, J.; Robinson, G. Sorsby, A. (2008) Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes. London: Ministry of Justice. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/restorative-justice-report_06-08.pdf Zehr H Towes B (EDS) Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, Willan Publishing Week 5 Public Protection, Prisons and Resettlement Date: 20/10/09 Lecture: 10am to 1pm (Nicola Carr and Willie McAuley, PPNAI) Public protection has formed an important part of the work of criminal justice agencies in recent years. This lecture explores the ââ¬Ëpublic protection discourse, and its practical implications in relation to new ââ¬Ëpublic protection arrangements. The second part of this lecture will focus on the role of social work in relation to prisoners and their families and the role of resettlement. Tutorial: 23/09/09(Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) This tutorial will follow from this weeks lecture and address issues in relation to prisoners, the effects of imprisonment and resettlement. Public Protection, Prisons and Resettlement Burnett, R. Maruna, S. (2006) ââ¬ËThe kindness of prisoners: Strengths-based resettlement in theory and action. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 1: 83-106 Corcoran, M. (2007) ââ¬ËNormalisation and its discontents: Constructing the ââ¬Ëirreconcilable female political prisoner in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Criminology, 47,3: 405-422 Her Majestys Inspectorates of Prison and Probation (2001) Through the Prison Gate: A Joint Thematic Review. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/inspectorates/hmi-prisons/docs/prison-gate-rps.pdf Kemshall, H. (1996) Reviewing Risk: A review of the research on the assessment and management of risk and dangerousness: Implications for policy and practice in the Probation Service. London: Home Office Kemshall, H. Maguire, M. (2001) ââ¬ËPublic Protection, partnership and risk penality: The Multi-Agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders. Punishment and Society, 3,2: 237-264 Lewis, S.; Vennard, J.; Maguire, M.; Raynor, P.; Vanstone, M.; Raybould, S. Rix, A. (2003) The Resettlement of short-term prisoners: an evaluation of seven pathfinders. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/occ83pathfinders.pdf McEvoy, K.; Shirlow, P. McElrath, K. (2004) ââ¬ËResistance, transition and exclusion: Politically motivated ex-prisoners and conflict transformation in Northern Ireland. Terrorism and Political Violence, 16, 3: 646-670 Maguire, M. Raynor, P. (2006) ââ¬ËHow the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime: Or does it? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 1:19-38 Maruna, S. Liebling, A. (2004) The Effects of Imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan Matthews, R. (2009) ââ¬ËPrisons in C. Hale; K, Hayward; A. Wahidin E. Wincup (Eds.) Criminology (Second Edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press Public Protection Arrangements Northern Ireland (PPANI) Guidance to Agencies. Belfast: Northern Ireland Office. Available at: http://www.publicprotectionni.com/ Scraton, P. Moore, L. (2004) The Hurt Inside. The Imprisonment of women and girls in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. Available at: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/oct/the-hurt-inside-nihrc.pdf Scraton, P. Moore, L. (2005) ââ¬ËDegradation, harm and survival in a womens prison. Social Policy and Society, 5, 1: 67-7 Wahidin, A. (2009) ââ¬ËAgeing in prison: crime and the criminal justice system. In: C. Hale; K, Hayward; A. Wahidin E. Wincup (Eds.) Criminology (Second Edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Week 6: Working with young people in the criminal justice system balancing welfare and justice? Date: 27/10/09 Lecture: 10am to 1pm Nicola Carr Working with young people who are involved in the criminal justice system involves addressing the context of offending and the welfare needs of the young person. This lecture will cover the theories and practices that inform this work, with reference to research literature and the current system and policy context in Northern Ireland. Lecture: 2pm to 4pm (Kelvin Doherty, Youth Justice Agency) The afternoon lecture will be delivered by Kelvin Doherty, from the Youth Justice Agency, who will provide an overview of the youth conferencing service in Northern Ireland. The lecture will focus on the aims, rationale and operation of youth conferences through an interactive session. Working with Young People in the Criminal Justice System Campbell, C.; Devlin, R.; OMahony, D.; Doak, J.; Jackson, J.; Corrigan, T. McEvoy, K. (2006) Evaluation of the Northern Ireland Youth Conference Service. Belfast: Northern Ireland Office. Available: http://www.nio.gov.uk/evaluation_of_the_northern_ireland_youth_conference_service.pdf Ellison, G. (2001) Young People, Crime, Policing and Victimisation in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Queens University. Available at: http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/police/ellison00.htm Graham, J. Bowling, B. (1995) Young People and Crime (Home Office Research Study No. 145), London: Home Office Hamilton, J.; Radford, K. Jarman, N. (2003) Policing, Accountability and Young People. Belfast: Institute for Conflict Research. Available at: http://www.conflictresearch.org.uk/documents/policeyp.pdf Include Youth (2008) A Manifesto for Youth Justice in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Include Youth. Available at: http://www.includeyouth.org/fs/doc/Include-Youth-Manifesto-2008.pdf Leonard, M. (2004) Children in Interface Areas: Reflections from North Belfast. Belfast: Save the Children Muncie, J. (2004) Youth and Crime (Second Edition) London: Sage NICCY (2008) Children in Conflict with the Law and the Administration of Juvenile Justice. Belfast: NICCY. Available at: http://www.niccy.org/uploaded_docs/1_71784_NIC71784%20Childrens%20Rights%20Text%208.pdf
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment